WOMEN STRUGGLE TO DEFINE WHAT A WOMAN IS, BUT HAVE NO TROUBLE DEFINING TOXIC MANHOOD.

San Diego, CA (Wokeville Gazette) — As strange as it may seem, there is a new phenomenon among women today which has scientists and doctors confused. 

"We are unsure if this is an effect of long-COVID or something else", said Dr. Maryanne Williams a researcher at the University of San Diego. "All we know for sure is that this is something that is happening across America".

What Dr. Williams is referring to are the recent cases of women who are no longer able to define what a woman is.

The most prevalent example of this phenomenon was Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson—who was selected as the nominee to the Supreme Court by President Biden, in part because of the fact that she is a woman. During her hearing, she was unable to define what a woman is; noting that she was indeed not a biologist.

"We were already concerned in what we perceived to be an uptick in this type of behavior", said Dr. Williams. "But when it occurred again, especially to such a high-profile and public figure like Judge Brown Jackson, we knew we could no longer ignore the obvious".

That's when Dr. Williams and other researchers at the University of San Diego decided to use the Federal Grant money they had recently received as part of the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Fund—earmarked as part of the Ukraine Relief Package signed by Congress—to study this mysterious occurrence in better detail.

The University interviewed 1,500 women of various ages, races, sexual preferences, political affiliations, vaccination statuses, and cultural upbringings. There was a balance between women who had been infected with COVID, those who had not. Each of the women were asked to provide answers to two very specific questions.

"First, we wanted to know if they could define what a woman is", said Dr. Williams. "And secondly, we wanted to know if they could define toxic masculinity".

Much to their surprise the results were were very telling. While the majority of women, who considered themselves to be conservative were able to define woman, they seemed to struggle more with the second question; namely, what is toxic masculinity. However, in stark contrast—those women who considered themselves to be progressive—struggled significantly to define what a woman is but seemed to have no issues whatsoever defining toxic masculinity.

Dr. Williams weighed in with her thoughts on the validity of the study as well as what the results indicate for the culture at large.

"We found it puzzling that the evidence seems to point more to an ideological connection rather than a physiological or biological one", said Dr. Williams. "It's almost as if these women are living in two very different realities. In one, women are able to define what a woman is; in the traditional and conventional way. But then we see an inability and even a hesitancy, in progressive-leaning women, to define women or even utter something which might be considered offensive or repressive in any way. Unless, of course, that offense is directed at men. These same progressive women had absolutely no trouble defining toxic masculinity. That definition seemed to flow from they, without pause or second thought".

 Dr. Williams is still compiling and extrapolating they data. She said the grant was given with a very clear objective; as far as results that were required. And in order for her to receive future Federal Grants, she will make sure that whatever her findings are, they line up well with the expectations given and the results expected.